Ranking system continued Options

[Swinely]

'thanks to Swinelys "Off-Topic-Complaining" '

I'm not entirely sure why you have any power to lock threads on this board NHL. That was entirely on topic and you know it, hence you didn't actually reply to it, so tried closing it instead. I wasn't the one going off topic and directing insults at me because someone has some kind of complex, my posts were entirely on topic from the OP, unless you don't actually understand english fully? (That would be a good enough reason!)

You can not compare points per minute from vastly different size servers, more players = more xp per minute than smaller servers... I won't bother explaining that further as i'm sure you have a basic grasp of maths if you are fluent in several languages. This was the original point that i was agreeing with the OP on. So would you care to add a serious reply rather than just closing something because you know i'm right but don't want to accept it?

I did also say i wouldn't mind helping with any programming etc, but you were too busy telling me to get a life for no apparent reason... which is actually off topic anyway. Whats with the argumentative attitude rather than adding constructive inputs??

[sl.Proddi]

You can not compare points per minute from vastly different size servers, more players = more xp per minute than smaller servers...

why we can't use xp/min for a session? each player has the same conditions for that session and the absolut xp/min was not deciding. after session-calc there was an abstract "rating". u undestand this ? i think no...
if u have a better solution .. please write mathematics!