Ranking system continued Options

[Swinely]

'thanks to Swinelys "Off-Topic-Complaining" '

I'm not entirely sure why you have any power to lock threads on this board NHL. That was entirely on topic and you know it, hence you didn't actually reply to it, so tried closing it instead. I wasn't the one going off topic and directing insults at me because someone has some kind of complex, my posts were entirely on topic from the OP, unless you don't actually understand english fully? (That would be a good enough reason!)

You can not compare points per minute from vastly different size servers, more players = more xp per minute than smaller servers... I won't bother explaining that further as i'm sure you have a basic grasp of maths if you are fluent in several languages. This was the original point that i was agreeing with the OP on. So would you care to add a serious reply rather than just closing something because you know i'm right but don't want to accept it?

I did also say i wouldn't mind helping with any programming etc, but you were too busy telling me to get a life for no apparent reason... which is actually off topic anyway. Whats with the argumentative attitude rather than adding constructive inputs??

[Swinely]

http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=playerin...mp;idx=24965653

WTF!! 7 players on the server so it shouldn't count lmao.... but no it does??

[NHLfan]

http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=playerin...mp;idx=24965653

WTF!! 7 players on the server so it shouldn't count lmao.... but no it does??

Yes it did count, but not for you!
(sessiondetails)

the map took 6 minutes (it was a quickie!)
7 of 12 players which has connected on this map were count and did get a normal rating.
you didn't because you have played 4,5 minutes, which is too short.

It's necessary that at least 6 players, play at least 5 minutes per map.

Here are the details:

Not every player of a session, as well not every session is being calculated. There a several requirements for this:

session-criteria:

* The session has to be at least five minutes long.
* A minimun number of six players have to play 2/3 of that session (the green bar should show 2/3)
* The played map must not be disabled (Trickjump- and sinper-maps are disabled by default for a valid rating)
* No bot- or tv-server is allowed and punkbuster has to be enabled

You didn't get the rating, because you didn't meet the criteria, it's that simple!

[Swinely]

http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=playerin...mp;idx=24965653

WTF!! 7 players on the server so it shouldn't count lmao.... but no it does??

Yes it did count, but not for you!
(sessiondetails)

the map took 6 minutes (it was a quickie!)
7 of 12 players which has connected on this map were count and did get a normal rating.
you didn't because you have played 4,5 minutes, which is too short.

It's necessary that at least 6 players, play at least 5 minutes per map.

Here are the details:

Not every player of a session, as well not every session is being calculated. There a several requirements for this:

session-criteria:

* The session has to be at least five minutes long.
* A minimun number of six players have to play 2/3 of that session (the green bar should show 2/3)
* The played map must not be disabled (Trickjump- and sinper-maps are disabled by default for a valid rating)
* No bot- or tv-server is allowed and punkbuster has to be enabled

You didn't get the rating, because you didn't meet the criteria, it's that simple!

Thats what I thought, I already knew most of that ^ . I wouldn't have been having knife stabbing wars if it was going to count >.>
Check on this page again! It clearly shows a - score. Even though on the details it shows no -ve. Talk about broken because its actually taken off the score anyway.

edit: hahah now look, even though i was getting the highest ppm of all players i still get -ve. The ranking system is utter bull shit with few players,it does not work in the slightest.

This post has been edited by Swinely: Jun 28 2007, 03:24 PM