Servers out of ranking..., Ausgeschlossene Server aus dem SL-Ranking Rating Options

[sl.Proddi]

The servers excluded from the SL-Ranking are listed below.
Those servers does not have correct settings to create a fair statistic.
In other words, their XP-System is configured to high or they deliver strongly distorted data for the session evaluation. As a result the player-toplist and the map-statistic is messed up. That would mean we have to disable more and more maps and the player-toplist will be distorted. That would not reflect our opinion. To ensure a fair statistic, it is necessary to exclude those servers from our ranking.
Every server that do not deliver fair data will be checked detailed. We do not disable servers as long as we have not tested them. If the server runs i.e. a wrong configured XP-System, it will be excluded from our ranking.
If the server should be rated again, the players have to contact the corresponding admin of those server. He have to configure the XP-System in a normal way again. We could not do that for obvious reasons!
As soon as we get the info that the server calculates fair again, we check it again and enable the ranking for it.

An important note:
If a server sends distorted data for the second time, the server gets permanently excluded from the ranking!

We will not check it again because we do not have the time to do that. That means, the first time is a warning, the second time the server gets permanenty excluded.
Please show understanding for those sanctions because we want to provide a fair Splatterladder for everyone.



Hier werden die vom SL-Ranking gesperrten Server aufgelistet.
Diese Server, die hier genannt werden, haben keine korrekten Einstellungen, um eine faire Statistik entstehen zu lassen. Sprich, sie haben entweder ein zu hoch eingestelltes XP-Bewertungssystem oder sie liefern stark verfälschte Daten für die einzelne Sessionbewertung. Als Folge wirft dies die Spieler-Topliste sowie die Map-Statistik durcheinander. Das würde am Ende bedeuten, dass wir mehr Maps aus dem Ranking nehmen müssten und die Spieler-Topliste komplett verfälscht ist und nicht das Bild wiederspiegelt, welches wir eigentlich wollen. Um eine faire Statistik zu gewährleisten, ist es nötig, diese Server aus der Bewertung zu nehmen.
Jeder Server, von dem wir merken oder wir eine Info erhalten, dass dieser keine fairen Daten liefert, wird von uns ausgiebig geprüft. Wir schalten also keine Server auf Zuruf aus, ohne sie getestet zu haben. Bewahrheitet sich z.B. eine stark erhöhte XP-Bewertung, so wird der Server aus dem Ranking ausgeschlossen.
Soll der Server wieder entsperrt werden, müssen sich die Spieler an den jeweiligen Admin des Servers wenden. Er muss die Einstellungen wieder auf einen normalen Level zurückdrehen. Wir können diesen Part aus zeitlichen Gründen nicht übernehmen!
Erhalten wir die Info, dass der Server wieder fair berechnet, so prüfen wir dies erneut und schalten diesen wieder zum Ranking frei.

Dabei ein wichtiger Hinweis:
Tritt ein Server erneut, also zum zweiten Mal mit verfälschten Daten in Erscheinung, so bleibt der Server dauerhaft aus dem Ranking ausgeschlossen!

Wir werden diesen kein weiteres Mal prüfen, da wir dafür einfach nicht die Zeit haben. Das heißt, beim ersten Mal gibts eine Verwarnung und beim zweiten Mal einer Auffälligkeit wird dauerhaft gesperrt.
Bitte habt für diese Maßnahmen Verständniss da wir für alle Spieler (soweit für uns möglich) eine faire SL bieten möchten.

[Maffiosa]

Servers out of ranking:

[FlAme-GuArds] #1 [XPSave] -> modified xp rating system (6 xp / kill .. etc) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
MA Macaddict XPSave -> modified xp rating system (1 kill = 8 xp battlesense) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
>Slaughterhouse<24hXPsave -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
HarryHomers -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
[R]Clan XP-Save Public Server |Directgameserv^ -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-05

Servers back to ranking:

2006-07-02 / [L2K]Licence To Kill Clanserver -> modified xp rating system (ex. 10 xp / kill) / Sonyfan / 2006-07-01
2006-07-03 / !!!!<gTc> XP-SAVE 100h!!!! -> modified xp rating system (ex. 11 xp / kill) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01

what is the brobleem whit the [R]Clan Xpsave Public server then can you tell me what is to High can you help me?

[martart]

Servers out of ranking:

[FlAme-GuArds] #1 [XPSave] -> modified xp rating system (6 xp / kill .. etc) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
MA Macaddict XPSave -> modified xp rating system (1 kill = 8 xp battlesense) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
>Slaughterhouse<24hXPsave -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
HarryHomers -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
[R]Clan XP-Save Public Server |Directgameserv^ -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-05

Servers back to ranking:

2006-07-02 / [L2K]Licence To Kill Clanserver -> modified xp rating system (ex. 10 xp / kill) / Sonyfan / 2006-07-01
2006-07-03 / !!!!<gTc> XP-SAVE 100h!!!! -> modified xp rating system (ex. 11 xp / kill) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01

what is the brobleem whit the [R]Clan Xpsave Public server then can you tell me what is to High can you help me?

I fixt the problem already :)

[Maffiosa]

Servers out of ranking:

[FlAme-GuArds] #1 [XPSave] -> modified xp rating system (6 xp / kill .. etc) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
MA Macaddict XPSave -> modified xp rating system (1 kill = 8 xp battlesense) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
>Slaughterhouse<24hXPsave -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
HarryHomers -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
[R]Clan XP-Save Public Server |Directgameserv^ -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-05

Servers back to ranking:

2006-07-02 / [L2K]Licence To Kill Clanserver -> modified xp rating system (ex. 10 xp / kill) / Sonyfan / 2006-07-01
2006-07-03 / !!!!<gTc> XP-SAVE 100h!!!! -> modified xp rating system (ex. 11 xp / kill) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01

what is the brobleem whit the [R]Clan Xpsave Public server then can you tell me what is to High can you help me?

I fixt the problem already :)

yeah But what was the broblem

[sLy ?]

[anchor=us][leftimg]_gfx/flag_us_m.png[/leftimg][/anchor]Here the server closed of the SL-Ranking are listed.
To have let develop these servers those here to be called no correct attitudes around a fair statistics. Speak, it have either a too highly stopped XP-system of evaluation or it to supply strongly falsified data for the individual session evaluation. As consequence this throws the player Topliste as well as the map statistics in disorder. That at the end would mean which we more maps from the Ranking to take would have and which is completely falsified player Topliste and the picture does not again-reflect which we actually to want. In order to ensure a fair statistics is it now necessarily these servers from the evaluation to be taken.

Each server from which we or we notice do not receive info, this fair data supply from us extensively examined. We switch thus no servers to acclamation out without him to have tested. Proves to be true a strongly increased XP-evaluation the server from the Ranking is e.g. excluded.

The server is to have to be unlocked again the players to the respective Admin of the server to turn. It must turn back the attitudes normal level. We cannot take over this part for temporal reasons! We receive the info. that the server again fair computed examine we this again and de-energise this again to the Ranking.

An important note:
A server steps with falsified data into feature remains the server again, thus for the second time durably from the Ranking!

We will simply not examine this none far times there we also for temporal reasons for it the time to have. That is, the first time gibts check caution and with second times a remarkableness becomes durably closed.

Please have for these measures amplifier-change-eat we for all players (so far for us possible) a fair SL to offer there would like.
(Thanks to RAX for the translation)

this is ur prob....ur server is not right configurated...(xp damage and xp damage level is not normal of standard.)
so make u only high scores by sl....

standart is this

// g_damageXP [0|1|2]
// Optionally enables the awarding of XP based upon the amount of damage
// a player has done to the opposing team.
// Available options are:
// 0 - disabled: use normal ET XP awarding methods
// 1 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the skill category of the weapon used.
// When this mode is enabled, kills (regardless of method) are awarded
// a fixed value of 1 point of XP.
// 2 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the Battle Sense category.
// Normal XP amounts are awarded for kills (typically 3-5 XP).
// [default: 0]
set g_damageXP 0

// g_damageXPLevel [integer]
// This setting determines the amount of damage that a player must do to earn
// 1 point of XP. See g_damageXP for additional information.
// [default: 50]
set g_damageXPLevel 50


i think u have modified this....and this sucks

[Maffiosa]

[anchor=us][leftimg]_gfx/flag_us_m.png[/leftimg][/anchor]Here the server closed of the SL-Ranking are listed.
To have let develop these servers those here to be called no correct attitudes around a fair statistics. Speak, it have either a too highly stopped XP-system of evaluation or it to supply strongly falsified data for the individual session evaluation. As consequence this throws the player Topliste as well as the map statistics in disorder. That at the end would mean which we more maps from the Ranking to take would have and which is completely falsified player Topliste and the picture does not again-reflect which we actually to want. In order to ensure a fair statistics is it now necessarily these servers from the evaluation to be taken.

Each server from which we or we notice do not receive info, this fair data supply from us extensively examined. We switch thus no servers to acclamation out without him to have tested. Proves to be true a strongly increased XP-evaluation the server from the Ranking is e.g. excluded.

The server is to have to be unlocked again the players to the respective Admin of the server to turn. It must turn back the attitudes normal level. We cannot take over this part for temporal reasons! We receive the info. that the server again fair computed examine we this again and de-energise this again to the Ranking.

An important note:
A server steps with falsified data into feature remains the server again, thus for the second time durably from the Ranking!

We will simply not examine this none far times there we also for temporal reasons for it the time to have. That is, the first time gibts check caution and with second times a remarkableness becomes durably closed.

Please have for these measures amplifier-change-eat we for all players (so far for us possible) a fair SL to offer there would like.
(Thanks to RAX for the translation)

this is ur prob....ur server is not right configurated...(xp damage and xp damage level is not normal of standard.)
so make u only high scores by sl....

standart is this

// g_damageXP [0|1|2]
// Optionally enables the awarding of XP based upon the amount of damage
// a player has done to the opposing team.
// Available options are:
// 0 - disabled: use normal ET XP awarding methods
// 1 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the skill category of the weapon used.
// When this mode is enabled, kills (regardless of method) are awarded
// a fixed value of 1 point of XP.
// 2 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the Battle Sense category.
// Normal XP amounts are awarded for kills (typically 3-5 XP).
// [default: 0]
set g_damageXP 0

// g_damageXPLevel [integer]
// This setting determines the amount of damage that a player must do to earn
// 1 point of XP. See g_damageXP for additional information.
// [default: 50]
set g_damageXPLevel 50


i think u have modified this....and this sucks

We have changed this to 0 is that Good

[Noturox]

well that default doesnt make any sence, why should a damagexp at "0" have a damagexplevel "50" ... so i dont know how much you know about a server config but that DOESNT make sence lol when its of its off so then its pretty wird that a default level is 50..

[Maffiosa]

damage Xp is now 0 You can tak a Look ore something>.< I hope that you guys can Enabel Our server argain The server is [R]Clan Public Xpsave Server|Directgameservers.nl|

[[GFR]=simssis]

---

This post has been edited by [GFR]=simssis: Sep 17 2006, 03:38 PM

[[GFR]=simssis]

----


This post has been edited by [GFR]=simssis: Sep 17 2006, 03:38 PM

[Maffiosa]

When is our server back on the ranking systeem? who can help me then We have g_damage 0 But Set our server back On Sl Pleas

[Hellraiserr]

I think when sl.proddi passes by he will fix

[sl.Proddi]

When is our server back on the ranking systeem? who can help me then We have g_damage 0 But Set our server back On Sl Pleas

server is back

PS: nice server

[[GFR]=simssis]

haha sehr gut

[sLy ?]

=simssis' date='Jul 5 2006, 10:09 PM' post='23165']
is mia aba egal weil ich spiel eigentlich net für sl. 1^^1^^1 naja egal werden ja sehen was passiert...........

ich lach mich kaputt....eyy wenn du net für sl spielst why hast du euren server so configuriert das der hohe xps bringt und warum hast du gesagt das du auf 1 willst....lol junge werd erwachsen eyy ( bist 14 -.- )...und ich könnt mich immer amüsieren wenn ein server "back" kommt xD...wie du dich dann immer aufregst loool ....naja papa erlaubt net den server on zu lassen xD eyy wenn ich zu meinen vater gehen würde sagen würde papa darf ich mein server on lassen der lacht sich kaputt....der würde sagen kein prob mach nur...

This post has been edited by RAX: Jul 6 2006, 03:33 PM

[sl.Proddi]

lass ihn doch, er hat doch sonst nix