Servers out of ranking..., Ausgeschlossene Server aus dem SL-Ranking Rating Options

[TheRealFragger]

hey,

Hier ist der admin von Flame Guards #1 [XPsave]
xp settings sind wieder normal, letzter output zwei minuten zuvor:

20:10:19:> g_damagexp
---------------------
"g_damageXP" is:"0" default:"0"

20:11:26:> g_damageXPLevel
--------------------------
"g_damageXPLevel" is:"50" default:"50"

Bitte setzt den Server wieder rein.
Vielen Dank
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Fragger

[t2x_go]

Well I feel that my server is underrated cause it is always full. There are new peopple coming there everyday and same ones saty ther everday. i have seen servers at the top of the list that should not be there at all!!!!!!!! I think the rating system need to be adjusted to a better system

[Noturox]

Well I feel that my server is underrated cause it is always full. There are new peopple coming there everyday and same ones saty ther everday. i have seen servers at the top of the list that should not be there at all!!!!!!!! I think the rating system need to be adjusted to a better system

well your talking about the serverlist, that runs on popularity, and the popularity is based on howmany different connections to your server have been made... so that doesnt have anything to do with that rating system

[sl.Wachente]

hey,

Hier ist der admin von Flame Guards #1 [XPsave]
xp settings sind wieder normal, letzter output zwei minuten zuvor:

20:10:19:> g_damagexp
---------------------
"g_damageXP" is:"0" default:"0"

20:11:26:> g_damageXPLevel
--------------------------
"g_damageXPLevel" is:"50" default:"50"

Bitte setzt den Server wieder rein.
Vielen Dank
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Fragger

Kann ich nicht überprüfen, da stürzt jedesmal mein ET ab, muß jemand anderes machen.

[pun!sher]

yeah we can get ranked from L2Kserver again :):)

[Sonyfan]

hey,

Hier ist der admin von Flame Guards #1 [XPsave]
xp settings sind wieder normal, letzter output zwei minuten zuvor:

20:10:19:> g_damagexp
---------------------
"g_damageXP" is:"0" default:"0"

20:11:26:> g_damageXPLevel
--------------------------
"g_damageXPLevel" is:"50" default:"50"

Bitte setzt den Server wieder rein.
Vielen Dank
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Fragger

Wenn ich dazu komme mache ich es Anfang kommender Woche (Mo/Di) bzw. teste den Server. Ansonsten muss Proddi ran.

[sLy ?]

hey

hab vlt welche gefunden... schaut se euch mal an

http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=serverinfo&idx=165888
http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=serverinfo&idx=115745

ich kann mich natürlich auch täuschen bin ja keine machine

This post has been edited by RAX: Jul 3 2006, 05:31 PM

[sl.Proddi]

hey

hab vlt welche gefunden... schaut se euch mal an

http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=serverinfo&idx=165888
http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=serverinfo&idx=115745

ich kann mich natürlich auch täuschen bin ja keine machine

sind geprüft und aus dem ranking genommen worden worden

[sLy ?]

wieder server der mir seit längeren aufgefallen ist..

http://et.splatterladder.com/?mod=serverinfo&idx=95331

[hato93[D]]

Na ja ist ja alles irgentwo schon richtig! und das Ranking ist ja eine super Sache wobei der Spielspass dann doch mehr im Vordergrund stehen sollte oder bei uns jedenfalls steht.Ist doch eigentlich Wurscht wer wo steht im Ranking und sich gezielt auf die suche machen nach verdächtigen Servern kann ja auch nicht Sinn und Zweck der Sache sein

[Maffiosa]

Servers out of ranking:

[FlAme-GuArds] #1 [XPSave] -> modified xp rating system (6 xp / kill .. etc) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
MA Macaddict XPSave -> modified xp rating system (1 kill = 8 xp battlesense) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
>Slaughterhouse<24hXPsave -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
HarryHomers -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
[R]Clan XP-Save Public Server |Directgameserv^ -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-05

Servers back to ranking:

2006-07-02 / [L2K]Licence To Kill Clanserver -> modified xp rating system (ex. 10 xp / kill) / Sonyfan / 2006-07-01
2006-07-03 / !!!!<gTc> XP-SAVE 100h!!!! -> modified xp rating system (ex. 11 xp / kill) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01

what is the brobleem whit the [R]Clan Xpsave Public server then can you tell me what is to High can you help me?

[martart]

Servers out of ranking:

[FlAme-GuArds] #1 [XPSave] -> modified xp rating system (6 xp / kill .. etc) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
MA Macaddict XPSave -> modified xp rating system (1 kill = 8 xp battlesense) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
>Slaughterhouse<24hXPsave -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
HarryHomers -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
[R]Clan XP-Save Public Server |Directgameserv^ -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-05

Servers back to ranking:

2006-07-02 / [L2K]Licence To Kill Clanserver -> modified xp rating system (ex. 10 xp / kill) / Sonyfan / 2006-07-01
2006-07-03 / !!!!<gTc> XP-SAVE 100h!!!! -> modified xp rating system (ex. 11 xp / kill) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01

what is the brobleem whit the [R]Clan Xpsave Public server then can you tell me what is to High can you help me?

I fixt the problem already :)

[Maffiosa]

Servers out of ranking:

[FlAme-GuArds] #1 [XPSave] -> modified xp rating system (6 xp / kill .. etc) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
MA Macaddict XPSave -> modified xp rating system (1 kill = 8 xp battlesense) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01
>Slaughterhouse<24hXPsave -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
HarryHomers -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-04
[R]Clan XP-Save Public Server |Directgameserv^ -> modified xp rating system / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-05

Servers back to ranking:

2006-07-02 / [L2K]Licence To Kill Clanserver -> modified xp rating system (ex. 10 xp / kill) / Sonyfan / 2006-07-01
2006-07-03 / !!!!<gTc> XP-SAVE 100h!!!! -> modified xp rating system (ex. 11 xp / kill) / sl.Proddi / 2006-07-01

what is the brobleem whit the [R]Clan Xpsave Public server then can you tell me what is to High can you help me?

I fixt the problem already :)

yeah But what was the broblem

[sLy ?]

[anchor=us][leftimg]_gfx/flag_us_m.png[/leftimg][/anchor]Here the server closed of the SL-Ranking are listed.
To have let develop these servers those here to be called no correct attitudes around a fair statistics. Speak, it have either a too highly stopped XP-system of evaluation or it to supply strongly falsified data for the individual session evaluation. As consequence this throws the player Topliste as well as the map statistics in disorder. That at the end would mean which we more maps from the Ranking to take would have and which is completely falsified player Topliste and the picture does not again-reflect which we actually to want. In order to ensure a fair statistics is it now necessarily these servers from the evaluation to be taken.

Each server from which we or we notice do not receive info, this fair data supply from us extensively examined. We switch thus no servers to acclamation out without him to have tested. Proves to be true a strongly increased XP-evaluation the server from the Ranking is e.g. excluded.

The server is to have to be unlocked again the players to the respective Admin of the server to turn. It must turn back the attitudes normal level. We cannot take over this part for temporal reasons! We receive the info. that the server again fair computed examine we this again and de-energise this again to the Ranking.

An important note:
A server steps with falsified data into feature remains the server again, thus for the second time durably from the Ranking!

We will simply not examine this none far times there we also for temporal reasons for it the time to have. That is, the first time gibts check caution and with second times a remarkableness becomes durably closed.

Please have for these measures amplifier-change-eat we for all players (so far for us possible) a fair SL to offer there would like.
(Thanks to RAX for the translation)

this is ur prob....ur server is not right configurated...(xp damage and xp damage level is not normal of standard.)
so make u only high scores by sl....

standart is this

// g_damageXP [0|1|2]
// Optionally enables the awarding of XP based upon the amount of damage
// a player has done to the opposing team.
// Available options are:
// 0 - disabled: use normal ET XP awarding methods
// 1 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the skill category of the weapon used.
// When this mode is enabled, kills (regardless of method) are awarded
// a fixed value of 1 point of XP.
// 2 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the Battle Sense category.
// Normal XP amounts are awarded for kills (typically 3-5 XP).
// [default: 0]
set g_damageXP 0

// g_damageXPLevel [integer]
// This setting determines the amount of damage that a player must do to earn
// 1 point of XP. See g_damageXP for additional information.
// [default: 50]
set g_damageXPLevel 50


i think u have modified this....and this sucks

[Maffiosa]

[anchor=us][leftimg]_gfx/flag_us_m.png[/leftimg][/anchor]Here the server closed of the SL-Ranking are listed.
To have let develop these servers those here to be called no correct attitudes around a fair statistics. Speak, it have either a too highly stopped XP-system of evaluation or it to supply strongly falsified data for the individual session evaluation. As consequence this throws the player Topliste as well as the map statistics in disorder. That at the end would mean which we more maps from the Ranking to take would have and which is completely falsified player Topliste and the picture does not again-reflect which we actually to want. In order to ensure a fair statistics is it now necessarily these servers from the evaluation to be taken.

Each server from which we or we notice do not receive info, this fair data supply from us extensively examined. We switch thus no servers to acclamation out without him to have tested. Proves to be true a strongly increased XP-evaluation the server from the Ranking is e.g. excluded.

The server is to have to be unlocked again the players to the respective Admin of the server to turn. It must turn back the attitudes normal level. We cannot take over this part for temporal reasons! We receive the info. that the server again fair computed examine we this again and de-energise this again to the Ranking.

An important note:
A server steps with falsified data into feature remains the server again, thus for the second time durably from the Ranking!

We will simply not examine this none far times there we also for temporal reasons for it the time to have. That is, the first time gibts check caution and with second times a remarkableness becomes durably closed.

Please have for these measures amplifier-change-eat we for all players (so far for us possible) a fair SL to offer there would like.
(Thanks to RAX for the translation)

this is ur prob....ur server is not right configurated...(xp damage and xp damage level is not normal of standard.)
so make u only high scores by sl....

standart is this

// g_damageXP [0|1|2]
// Optionally enables the awarding of XP based upon the amount of damage
// a player has done to the opposing team.
// Available options are:
// 0 - disabled: use normal ET XP awarding methods
// 1 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the skill category of the weapon used.
// When this mode is enabled, kills (regardless of method) are awarded
// a fixed value of 1 point of XP.
// 2 - 1 point of XP is awarded per g_damageXPLevel points of damage done.
// The XP is placed in the Battle Sense category.
// Normal XP amounts are awarded for kills (typically 3-5 XP).
// [default: 0]
set g_damageXP 0

// g_damageXPLevel [integer]
// This setting determines the amount of damage that a player must do to earn
// 1 point of XP. See g_damageXP for additional information.
// [default: 50]
set g_damageXPLevel 50


i think u have modified this....and this sucks

We have changed this to 0 is that Good